Skip navigation

Both Moodle and Mahara share a common heritage of open source and learner-ownership; this second characteristic is emphasised in the case of Mahara.

The ‘learner-owned’ aspect can be a powerful one: intrinsic motivation is stronger than extrinsic, and aren’t learners always encouraged to see an e-portfolio as theirs?

However, if it is at all linked to a course of study or someone else’s definition of proficiency, to what degree does it ever truly belong to the learner: who writes the assessment criteria, who sets the deadlines…? If student and institution share ownership, is it negotiable?

We can tell a student that an e-portfolio is theirs but do they experience this and, if so, how? Not just questions for Mahara users but anyone employing e-portfolios.

Many good points made here:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: