Skip navigation

Tag Archives: moral maze

I really didn’t intend to listen to the Moral Maze, in much the same way I don’t go looking at road accidents. But it was about science and what can I say: I was weak, I listened and I paid the price. Let that be a moral lesson to me.

If you didn’t hear it (it was supposed to be about the controversy over certain climate-change emails) you have a few days to catch up with it. For those who didn’t get there quickly enough, in a nutshell: scientists are biased, follow their own interests, like attention and have opinions. My goodness, I think the panel just declared scientists to be human.

Yes, we are all that, like everyone else, and we know it but collectively we want to be something better. Because of that we have built in a system of checks and balances which includes publication of results and methods to our peers. It didn’t take a parliamentary enquiry to do that, the community did it for itself.

Because we might have been partial in our research, we use the science community to act as a check (because our vanity devotion to science means we love to catch someone else out try our hardest to ensure inaccuracies in data or procedure are eradicated.) And because of this people do get caught ‘cooking’ their data which, for the rest of us, is embarrassing and annoying because it lets us all down and worse still it lets ‘science’ down (I’d have them coated in jam and staked out on fire ant hills, I’d even buy the jam.) 

Thanks for the offer but I don’t think we need politicians to bring us the gift of skepticism, though they might employ their skeptical eye to their professions’ expense claims if they are looking for something to do. And, for reference, a scientist is not defined as someone with a PhD. Don’t see why you should listen to someone who doesn’t have one? Do you have one? 

Referring to the evidence (‘hiding behind the science’ as you so beautifully put it) shuts down the debate, yes? Er, no, it moves the debate to the evidence itself. ‘I don’t care about the evidence, I just believe in freedom’, now that’s an example of shutting down a debate.

Thankfully, before I concluded that Radio 4 were losing their claim to purvey intelligent speech, I listened to the repeat of the first episode of a new series: The Infinite Monkey Cage. What a contrast: people talking and other listening; intelligent questions and room for the audience to think. Was it biased? Yes, it was full of opinion and comment but didn’t claim not to be. Again, if you missed it you can still catch it if you’re quick.

Moral Maze

Infinite Monkey Cage

Oh dear. What a waste of an opportunity to explore the use of microblogging on yesterday’s episode of the Moral Maze. Instead we seemed to be offered only a debate built on the flimsy foundation of the now familiar stereotypical image of Twitter.  If you missed it and want to hear the episode it is available for the next week though sadly I will warn you, you will probably not be challenged and will likely learn nothing.

The usual criticisms were made about the impossibility of depth or reflection given the character limit of the message, these observations made by… non-users. Well you can’t knock the programme for being elitist when it comes to qualifying to speak or present. And how much easier it is to see when your view is unclouded by actual experience, I do look forward to my invitation to debate the pros and cons of keyhole surgery or in fact anything else I haven’t done. 

Herd mentality, mob rule… yes, worthy topics of discussion but are they special and distinctive of microbloggers? Hardly, so why was this this focus of discussion?

I’ve lost count of the number of positive experiences I’ve gained through the use of web 2.0 tools, it’s what keeps me using them, but part of that experience has stemmed from my approach: Twitter, like life, is what you make it.

If you don’t want to Twitter (or anything else) my advice is: ‘don’t’. But you didn’t need that advice did you, or to be reminded that what you don’t find useful some others might. I’ll be sure to remind the panel of this when I’m invited along to wax lyrical on dry stone walling and its role in the breakdown of family life next week.